<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ChannelFreakers &#187; SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://channelfreakers.co.uk/category/seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://channelfreakers.co.uk</link>
	<description>Online Marketing Freaks!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 21:54:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Optimising Foreign Languages</title>
		<link>http://channelfreakers.co.uk/2009/11/lost-in-translation/</link>
		<comments>http://channelfreakers.co.uk/2009/11/lost-in-translation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Graham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linkbuilding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[page rank directories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channelfreakers.co.uk/?p=88</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#8217;t Get Lost In Translation
Given there are over 150 million bloggers and that is excluding Chinese language blogs, and Google claims that in five years we will all use the internet in Chinese. Clever google giving the right soundbites. Global sales can really increase a companies sales and search engine optimisation for a translated website [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Don&#8217;t Get Lost In Translation</h2>
<p>Given there are over 150 million bloggers and that is excluding Chinese language blogs, and Google claims that in five years we will all use the internet in Chinese. Clever google giving the right soundbites. Global sales can really increase a companies sales and search engine optimisation for a translated website is slightly different. A translated site will support an English searcher arriving on site, and then switching to the preferred language but we should think of optimising for localised searches.</p>
<div id="attachment_99" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 333px"><img class="size-full wp-image-99" title="directories" src="http://channelfreakers.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/directories.jpg" alt="The High Page Rank Directories" width="323" height="258" /><p class="wp-caption-text">The High Page Rank Directories</p></div>
<h2>Online Marketing In A Foreign Language</h2>
<p>Unfortunately my request to go to France to do keyword research fell on deaf ears. The site needs to perform well before these trips can sell themselves. Struggling to find  a foreign language keyword list, there are always sites like suggestyooda.com to get relevant keywords. Avoid mixing languages, as this will only diminish efforts to rise up the search results.</p>
<p>The groundwork is vital before the more familiar SEO begins. Linkbuilding, via open directories like DMOZ. Also I am establishing profiles on social sites and starting different blogs on the relevant host, which is google.fr. The whole exercise has enhanced my language skills and sharpened my SEO skills.  Article submission gives more exposure to the website  noticed using  the websites keyword list.</p>
<div id="attachment_102" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 240px"><img class="size-full wp-image-102" title="Linkbuilding " src="http://channelfreakers.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/jigsaw-puzzle.jpg" alt="The Linkbuilding Process" width="230" height="201" /><p class="wp-caption-text">The Linkbuilding Process</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://channelfreakers.co.uk/2009/11/lost-in-translation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quality Links Not Quantity</title>
		<link>http://channelfreakers.co.uk/2009/11/quality-links-not-quantity/</link>
		<comments>http://channelfreakers.co.uk/2009/11/quality-links-not-quantity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Graham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article submission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[directories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimisation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channelfreakers.co.uk/?p=64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where Have All The Quality Links Gone
Google have spoken about their policy of ranking websites that exhibit authority and high page rank.  They have produced a toolbar option, the  sidewiki  for users to add relevant content to the search engine.  During the Vince and caffeine updates, it was an opportunity to monitor traffic to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Where Have All The Quality Links Gone</h2>
<p>Google have spoken about their policy of ranking websites that exhibit authority and high page rank.  They have produced a toolbar option, the  sidewiki  for users to add relevant content to the search engine.  During the Vince and caffeine updates, it was an opportunity to monitor traffic to my sites in other search engines.  With Facebook getting a limited integration with Bing, there is a potential for quality links from facebook.</p>
<p>Linkbuilding is becoming less effective, so I am improving my page rank through article submissions with optimised titles and keywords littered throughout. Articles and press releases, if carefully constructed give some quality links. Similarily, directory submissions are still an active part of my SEO, and along with the articles, they have to be submitted to high page rank sites only.</p>
<p><img class="size-full wp-image-78 alignright" title="Quality Links" src="http://channelfreakers.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/pagerank_google.jpg" alt="pagerank_google" width="300" height="300" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://channelfreakers.co.uk/2009/11/quality-links-not-quantity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is it worth building directories anymore?</title>
		<link>http://channelfreakers.co.uk/2009/11/is-it-worth-building-directories-anymore/</link>
		<comments>http://channelfreakers.co.uk/2009/11/is-it-worth-building-directories-anymore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[devalued directories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[directories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[directory submission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google update online marketting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[page rank update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search engine optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam directories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channelfreakers.co.uk/?p=60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’m sure you are all aware of the most recent Google update that took ages , maybe because of all the Google caffeine integrations. I was quite happy that my blogs got updated and i finally got a page rank on one of my blogs but i have been questioning the use of directories lately. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m sure you are all aware of the most recent Google update that took ages , maybe because of all the Google caffeine integrations. I was quite happy that my blogs got updated and i finally got a page rank on one of my blogs but i have been questioning the use of directories lately. As every SEO i have done quite a lot of link building in my time and i still do as i believe link building is a great way to rank for terms and keywords in Google and to drive loads of traffic to a your website.  Link building to me means building a variety of links that will contribute to the required result in Google. These links good be directories, blogs, article submissions, blog commenting and some other types. I&#8217;m quite skeptical about the use of directories these days, it seems Google is punishing all the spam directories and in general devaluing all the directories. I had a list that i made about 6 months ago that listed ( The directory name, the url and the page rank) I went and checked the page rank of the directories after the recent update and most of the directories where significantly devalued, some of them went from page rank 5 to page rank  1 or zero, which is a disaster, for them anyway.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img class="size-medium wp-image-62 aligncenter" src="http://channelfreakers.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/no-spam-2x-300x300.gif" alt="no-spam-2x" width="384" height="384" /></p>
<p>I also noticed that most of the directories that got devalued were the spammy directories, most of the good directories remained the same (page rank wise) or got devalued a bit. I  personally believe that some directories are worth submitting to, but the majority of them are significantly devalued and if you are linking to them it might have negative effects for your website too. I&#8217;m still going to build directory links however i will differentiate the good links from the bad quality ones. I still think the best way to got about link building is to use a variety of links, we just have to watch from now on ,and not submit thousands of links to random directories as it will most probably have a negative effect!</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img class="size-full wp-image-61 aligncenter" src="http://channelfreakers.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/google-spam-300x251.jpg" alt="google-spam-300x251" width="388" height="324" /></p>
<p>Ari</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://channelfreakers.co.uk/2009/11/is-it-worth-building-directories-anymore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google PageRank Finally Updates &#8211; Oct 09</title>
		<link>http://channelfreakers.co.uk/2009/10/google-pagerank-finally-updates-oct-09/</link>
		<comments>http://channelfreakers.co.uk/2009/10/google-pagerank-finally-updates-oct-09/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channelfreakers.co.uk/?p=35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At Last Google PageRank Has Updated
OK, I know I only posted yesterday but this is important.
For the past few weeks we have all been waiting anxiously on the PageRank update to kick in and now it has. As I only saw it a couple of hours ago I haven&#8217;t got too much info on it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>At Last Google PageRank Has Updated</h2>
<p>OK, I know I only posted yesterday but this is important.</p>
<p>For the past few weeks we have all been waiting anxiously on the PageRank update to kick in and now it has. As I only saw it a couple of hours ago I haven&#8217;t got too much info on it except that it looks like a biggie! Normally a new site wthl some links in it would open at a PR3 but sites I have seen have opened at a PR1 and blogs that I haven&#8217;t done any work on since the last PR update have been reduced to a PR1.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 427px"><img title="Google PageRank" src="http://y4lcin.com/upload/Pagerank1.jpg" alt="One site feeds the other..." width="417" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">One site feeds the other...</p></div>
<p>It seems that Google are being less generous with the old green fairy dust than before. In saying that it&#8217;s not all bad because most of my clients have had a PR increases. I wonder if this has anything to do with Google giving more love to bigger brands?</p>
<p>I might need to do a PageRank explanation for the newbies&#8230;watch this space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://channelfreakers.co.uk/2009/10/google-pagerank-finally-updates-oct-09/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Webmaster Tools Needs Access Controls</title>
		<link>http://channelfreakers.co.uk/2009/10/google-webmaster-tools-needs-access-controls/</link>
		<comments>http://channelfreakers.co.uk/2009/10/google-webmaster-tools-needs-access-controls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channelfreakers.co.uk/?p=27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Webmaster Tool Access Should Be like Google Analytics
&#60;nic&#62;
OK I&#8217;m not saying that we shouldn&#8217;t need a server request to get access but after you give access, as far as I have seen, you can&#8217;t take access away without changing server. This is an obvious pain in the ass and almost impossible for any large companies [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Webmaster Tool Access Should Be like Google Analytics</h2>
<p>&lt;nic&gt;</p>
<p>OK I&#8217;m not saying that we shouldn&#8217;t need a server request to get access but after you give access, as far as I have seen, you can&#8217;t take access away without changing server. This is an obvious pain in the ass and almost impossible for any large companies to do without a proper business case.</p>
<p>The problem with someone that no longer works with or for you having webmaster tools access is that they can drop your site out of the rankings with a click of a button. BIG problem is you have you have parted on bad terms.</p>
<p>In a less malicious way having webmaster tools access can allow an ex-employee/ agency exploit  weaknesses in the companies website for financial gain or for in-depth competitor analysis. No one wants to be in the position where your old agency goes to pitch for your main competitor based on &#8216;we know what others don&#8217;t about your competitors&#8217; get hired and then systematically take your natural search marketing apart.</p>
<h3>What Should Google Do to Protect Webmaster</h3>
<p>Google should tie Google Webmaster Tools into Google Analytics but only allow webmaster info to be seen if a server request has been completed. Not only would this allow you to control your users but I would suspect that it would increase the accuracy of Google Analytics tracking and allow particularly nerdy and analytical folk to figure out more accurate position CTR.</p>
<p>&lt;/nic&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://channelfreakers.co.uk/2009/10/google-webmaster-tools-needs-access-controls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO &amp; Blogging</title>
		<link>http://channelfreakers.co.uk/2009/10/seo-blogging/</link>
		<comments>http://channelfreakers.co.uk/2009/10/seo-blogging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Graham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channelfreakers.co.uk/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently celebrating its tenth anniversary, the blog combines as a key tool in Search Engine Optimisation. Writing blogs should be about fun and interaction and I am here to tell you that it is . Google needs bloggers to continue their work anyway, and they are a long way off perfecting their ranking system. The good [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left">Recently celebrating its tenth anniversary, the blog combines as a key tool in Search Engine Optimisation. Writing blogs should be about fun and interaction and I am here to tell you that it is . Google needs bloggers to continue their work anyway, and they are a long way off perfecting their ranking system. The good news is SEO is here to stay!</p>
<p><img class="size-full wp-image-22 alignright" src="http://channelfreakers.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/blog-blogging.jpg" alt="blog" width="500" height="375" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://channelfreakers.co.uk/2009/10/seo-blogging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
